Which Supreme Court case established due process rights for juveniles?

The case that established due process rights for juveniles is "In re Gault" (1967). This landmark Supreme Court decision recognized that juveniles have the right to a fair trial, including the right to counsel and the right to confront witnesses. The ruling was pivotal because it ensured that minors are afforded the same constitutional protections as adults in the justice system, fundamentally changing how juvenile courts operate.

By establishing these rights, the Court aimed to ensure that the legal proceedings involving minors were just and fair, acknowledging that their status as children does not diminish their entitlement to due process. This case laid the groundwork for subsequent rulings regarding the rights of juveniles in the legal system, reinforcing the principle that fairness in legal proceedings is a requisite for all individuals, regardless of age.

Other options pertain to related issues in juvenile justice but do not directly establish due process rights for juveniles. "In re Winship" focuses on the standard of proof required in juvenile cases, "New Jersey v. TLO" deals with search and seizure in schools, and "Roper v. Simmons" addresses the death penalty for juveniles, reflecting a broader spectrum of juvenile rights but not directly related to due process as established in "In re Gault."